MP19-08 AGE AND PARTIAL AZFC DELETION DO NOT PREDICT SPERM RETRIEVAL IN NON-MOSAIC KLINEFELTER PATIENTS

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Sperm Retrieval in Patients with Klinefelter Syndrome: A Skewed Regression Model Analysis

Background The most common chromosomal abnormality due to non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) is Klinefelter syndrome (KS) which occurs in 1-1.72 out of 500-1000 male infants. The probability of retrieving sperm as the outcome could be asymmetrically different between patients with and without KS, therefore logistic regression analysis is not a well-qualified test for this type of data. This stud...

متن کامل

Sperm retrieval rate and pregnancy rate in infertile couples undergoing in-vitro fertilisation and testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive azoospermia in Hong Kong.

OBJECTIVE There are currently no local data on the sperm retrieval and pregnancy rates in in-vitro fertilisation and testicular sperm extraction cycles, especially with regard to the presence of genetic abnormalities. This study aimed to determine the sperm retrieval and pregnancy rates in infertile couples who underwent in-vitro fertilisation and testicular sperm extraction for non-obstructive...

متن کامل

sperm retrieval in patients with klinefelter syndrome: a skewed regression model analysis

background: the most common chromosomal abnormality due to non-obstructive azoospermia (noa) is klinefelter syndrome (ks) which occurs in 1-1.72 out of 500-1000 male infants. the probability of retrieving sperm as the outcome could be asymmetrically different between patients with and without ks, therefore logistic regression analysis is not a well-qualified test for this type of data. this stu...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Urology

سال: 2018

ISSN: 0022-5347,1527-3792

DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.02.657